retro.pizza

Georg KrammerAnother paper is with <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MethodsInPsychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MethodsInPsychology</a> at <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> submitted in the middle for February. 6 1/2 month later and it doesn't even have a second <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/reviewer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer</a> yet.I am an advocate of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SlowScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SlowScience</a> but that is not what I meant by it :(<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PeerReview</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/frontiers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#frontiers</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#science</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#publishing</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/frustrating" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#frustrating</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicJournals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicJournals</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academia</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#psychology</a>

Albert Cardona“AI slop and the destruction of knowledge”, by <a href="https://scholar.social/@Iris" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@Iris</a> <a href="https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2025/08/12/ai-slop-and-the-destruction-of-knowledge/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2025/08/12/ai-slop-and-the-destruction-of-knowledge/</a>On Elsevier placing confidently wrong LLM-generated summaries of scientific concepts on the webpages of scientific peer-reviewed papers.I mean it’s Elsevier, they only care about making money off academics. But you’d think this would undermine their business. Of course, Elsevier employees don’t read the papers they publish much less would understand most of them. How they determined that such summaries were helpful is anyone’s guess; my guess is that someone needed a promotion and offered this as a way to claim to their line managers or investors that Elsevier uses “AI”.<a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academia</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/RELX" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RELX</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/ScientificPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScientificPublishing</a>

petersuber<a href="https://sauropods.win/@mike" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@mike</a> +1. When <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> sent takedown notices to a few <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Harvard" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Harvard</a> authors who posted copies of their articles to their personal web sites (2014), I did an interview with Harvard Library and replied much as you did: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20140421124904/https://library.harvard.edu/03142014-1552/elsevier-takedown-notices-qa-peter-suber" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">http://web.archive.org/web/20140421124904/https://library.harvard.edu/03142014-1552/elsevier-takedown-notices-qa-peter-suber</a>"Authors can’t blame Elsevier for enforcing the rights they gave it. If they dislike what Elsevier is doing, they should submit future work to a different publisher."

Ross MounceLike "Linux on the Desktop" will 2025 be the year that academics finally realise that choosing to publish with Elsevier isn't a good idea?key quote from Elsevier rep:"rights of papers are owned by the publishers hence, there is no consent needed from authors"Translation:We're allowed to do it because you signed your rights away. We're going to do it because $MONEY. You can't stop us doing it. Byeeee!Source: <a href="https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2025/08/12/ai-slop-and-the-destruction-of-knowledge/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2025/08/12/ai-slop-and-the-destruction-of-knowledge/</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AIslop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AIslop</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AcademicPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicPublishing</a>

Stephen EglenUK journal news:Jisc have shared the proposals from the five big journal publishers (<a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a>, <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/SpringerNature" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SpringerNature</a>, Taylor&Francis, Wiley, Sage) for renewals of the "big deals".Feedback is requested by end of August, so if you are interested, please talk to your local library team. TLDR: it's more of the same. Happy to share more comments off line.<a href="https://www.jisc.ac.uk/next-generation-open-access" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.jisc.ac.uk/next-generation-open-access</a><a href="https://biologists.social/@steveroyle" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@steveroyle</a> <a href="https://biologists.social/@SteveRuss" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@SteveRuss</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@albertcardona" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@albertcardona</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@deevybee" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@deevybee</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/@david_colquhoun" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@david_colquhoun</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@rmounce" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@rmounce</a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/@tomstafford" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@tomstafford</a>

Stephen Eglen<a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> parent company RELX has just posted its six-monthly update.underlying growth up 9%"cientific, Technical & Medical with continued good growth and developing momentum"<a href="https://www.relx.com/media/press-releases/year-2025/first-half-2025" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.relx.com/media/press-releases/year-2025/first-half-2025</a>

Volker Stolz<a href="https://mastodon.social/@sundogplanets" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@sundogplanets</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> reminded me just today to share our new article on Google+ and Twitter. I wonder when the last time anyone there updated this template…

Matt HodgkinsonA decade later, this drivel is unretracted by Elsevier.<a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/PublicationEthics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PublicationEthics</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ProgressInBiophysicsAndMolecularBiology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ProgressInBiophysicsAndMolecularBiology</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/OttoRossler" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OttoRossler</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/Autism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Autism</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/CrackpotTheories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CrackpotTheories</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/Elephants" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elephants</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/Pseudoscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Pseudoscience</a>

UG Faculty of PhilosophyEvent: <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Academia</a> at the Digital Crossroads - join us to discuss chances and risks of the digital transformation of the <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#university</a>, <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/DigitalSovereignty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DigitalSovereignty</a>, <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#publishing</a> and <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/BigTech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BigTech</a>. September 25 in <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Groningen" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Groningen</a> Register at: <a href="https://www.rug.nl/library/calendar/250925-academia-at-the-digital-crossroads" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.rug.nl/library/calendar/250925-academia-at-the-digital-crossroads</a>With: Tamar Sharon (Radboud <a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Philosophy</a>), Juliette Schaafsma (Tilburg), David Cheruiyot (UG journalism), Marijke Folgering-van der Vliet (<a href="https://social.edu.nl/@Bibliothecaris" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@Bibliothecaris</a>) Michiel Kolman (<a href="https://social.edu.nl/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a>), Nolda Tipping (<a href="https://social.edu.nl/@CIT_RUG" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@CIT_RUG</a>), and <a href="https://akademienl.social/@FleurZeldenrust" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@FleurZeldenrust</a> (<a href="https://social.edu.nl/@DeJongeAkademie" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@DeJongeAkademie</a>)

petersuberUpdate. "Since 2017, the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/UK" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#UK</a> has mandated organisations employing more than 250 people to publicly report their annual <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/gender" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gender</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PayGap" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PayGap</a>…Every science publisher pays men more than women. In 2024, the lowest median pay gap favouring men was 9.5% (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SpringerNature" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SpringerNature</a>), followed by <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Sage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Sage</a> (13.3%), <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Wiley" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Wiley</a> (17.7%), and <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Informa" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Informa</a> (formerly Taylor & Francis) (22.7%). <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> remains an outlier in the magnitude of its gender pay gap and in the lack of progress. Eight years ago Elsevier stood out among publishers, with a median pay gap in 2017 of 40.4% in favour of men over women in its UK business…Elsevier’s median pay gap for 2024 is 32.8%, maintaining its position as worst performer among peers over all eight years of mandatory reporting." <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004673" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004673</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Publishers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Publishers</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScholComm</a>

Ross MounceRead of the day:Clark J, Zuccala E (2025) Gender pay gaps and inequity at science publishers. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(6): e0004673. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004673" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004673</a>"Eight years ago Elsevier stood out among publishers, with a median pay gap in 2017 of 40.4% in favour of men over women in its UK business. The UK average that year was 18.4% and we called Elsevier’s gap – double the national average – unacceptable"not enough seems to have changed 😠 <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Publishing</a>

MediaFaro AnalysisEleven studies by Spanish scientist Rafael Luque are retracted due to fraudulent practices.A new tool reveals the alleged cheating committed for years by the chemist, who was suspiciously prolific.With his 11 studies eliminated by publishers, he is already “in the top 0.1% of the most retracted authors of all time”.<a href="https://mediafaro.org/article/20250610-eleven-studies-by-spanish-scientist-rafael-luque-are-retracted-due-to-fraudulent-practices?mf_channel=mastodon&action=forward" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://mediafaro.org/article/20250610-eleven-studies-by-spanish-scientist-rafael-luque-are-retracted-due-to-fraudulent-practices?mf_channel=mastodon&action=forward</a><a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Science</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/RafaelLuque" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RafaelLuque</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/ScientificIntegrity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScientificIntegrity</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Argos" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Argos</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Research</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/DataManipulation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DataManipulation</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Retraction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Retraction</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Academia</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Cheating" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Cheating</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Chemistry" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Chemistry</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Wiley" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Wiley</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://mastodon.mediafaro.org/tags/Scitility" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Scitility</a>

Kevin Karhan :verified:<a href="https://neuromatch.social/@neuralreckoning" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@neuralreckoning</a> not to mention many journals are absurldy <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/paywalled" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#paywalled</a> (<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> are just the greediest <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/rentseekers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#rentseekers</a>!) whilst also charging for <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/submissions" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#submissions</a> to the point that some are existing mostly as a means of <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/corporations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#corporations</a> to commit "<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AssetDenial" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AssetDenial</a>" against competitiors by <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#publishing</a> their own research, thus enshuring the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/competition" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#competition</a> can't <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/patent" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#patent</a> a specific product.<ul><li>Don't ask me how I know...</li></ul>

Nemo_bis 🌈Today in how <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> ruins my mood: Pure repositories pollute <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/Unpaywall" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Unpaywall</a> with garbage data. <a href="https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T396127" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T396127</a> <a href="https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T396126" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T396126</a><a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/OAbot" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OAbot</a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GreenOA</a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAccess</a>

Nemo_bis 🌈Why does <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/DOAJ" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DOAJ</a> have abstracts for articles which are closed access (nonfreely licensed and paywalled)?<a href="https://doaj.org/article/13b03a41fdac43c0b6772f0d7be22ccb" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doaj.org/article/13b03a41fdac43c0b6772f0d7be22ccb</a> (doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2016.07.010, <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GreenOA</a> at <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/10138/311483" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">http://hdl.handle.net/10138/311483</a>)This is an article published in 2017 in an <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> journal which in 2020 professed to turn "<a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAccess</a>". <a href="https://doaj.org/toc/1095-953X" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doaj.org/toc/1095-953X</a>

Ross MouncePublish with Elsevier at your peril...“Williams-Hoffman was surprised to discover that the online version of the paper contained an AI-generated question and answer section immediately below the abstract. She was even more surprised to read its claim that the paper was based on just three measurements, not 51. “<a href="https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/ai-summary-trashed-authors-work-and-took-weeks-be-corrected" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/ai-summary-trashed-authors-work-and-took-weeks-be-corrected</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a>

Robert W. GehlThis from a company making billions off the free labour of academics:<a href="https://ukrant.nl/magazine/elseviers-stranglehold-on-academia-how-publishers-get-rich-from-our-data/?lang=en" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://ukrant.nl/magazine/elseviers-stranglehold-on-academia-how-publishers-get-rich-from-our-data/?lang=en</a>2/2<a href="https://aoir.social/tags/academicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academicChatter</a> <a href="https://aoir.social/tags/elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#elsevier</a>

John LeonardThe use of AI to create bogus scientific papers is becoming an increasingly serious problem, researchers say, threatening life-saving medical research as well as the integrity of academic publishing.<a href="https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2025/ai/ai-enabled-fakery-has-infiltrated-academic-publishing-say-researchers" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2025/ai/ai-enabled-fakery-has-infiltrated-academic-publishing-say-researchers</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/technews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#technews</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/vegetativeelectronmicroscopy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#vegetativeelectronmicroscopy</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ai</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#fraud</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#elsevier</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/springer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#springer</a>

petersuberPeter Barr explains why three UK <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/universities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#universities</a> recently cancelled their <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReadAndPublish" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReadAndPublish</a> agreements and why these deals are unsustainable. <a href="https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20250211161002365" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20250211161002365</a>PS: My own objections to these deals overlap significantly with Barr's. See the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/BOAI20" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BOAI20</a> Recommendation 4 ("Move away from read-and-publish agreements"). <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Cancellations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Cancellations</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenAccess</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScholComm</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Academia</a> <a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicchatter" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@academicchatter</a>

just small circles 🕊<a href="https://social.coop/tags/Showerthought" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Showerthought</a> 🤔1. <a href="https://social.coop/tags/Business" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Business</a> <a href="https://social.coop/tags/paywall" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#paywall</a>? 😫2. <a href="https://social.coop/tags/CommercialScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CommercialScience</a> wall 🤢3. <a href="https://social.coop/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> delight 😍<a href="https://delightful.club/delightful-open-science" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://delightful.club/delightful-open-science</a>"Commercial science" is a good term to denounce this shady practice that withholds knowledge and wisdom discovered with public money in order to use it for <a href="https://social.coop/tags/HyperCapitalism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#HyperCapitalism</a> and its greed fests.Yes, you <a href="https://social.coop/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> & co.

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#elsevier